Saturday, January 28, 2012

Educator Preparation and Development - STaR Chart

(Based on Lamar Assignment EDLD 5352 - Week 2)

Educators must strive to continue to grow professionally by staying up to date with the latest technology and how it can be used in the classroom.  They must be able to use the technology to bring about the learning that is planned for.  This professional development requires time and resources that are already stretched.  It also requires a commitment by the school system to provide the structure in which these new tools can be developed and used. 

In my analysis of the statewide campus summary of the STaR Chart feedback, I have noticed that the largest majority of schools fell into the Developing Tech category of this particular area, Educator Preparation.  Out of all four areas and four categories, this was the single biggest group.  Also, on my particular campus, this area, Educator Preparation, had the lowest average score over the last three years.  This indicates that although the other areas are improving, we are not keeping up with that growth in Educator Preparation.  I think there are two fundamental problems in the way we attack this issue. 

The first is that we do not provide adequate, strategic, structured, differentiated, and systematic professional development.  What we provide is usually a broad overview of available resources, and then we expect the teachers to spend time investigating, practicing, and implementing these tools.  However, educators are under constant pressure for short-term improvement, so their own long-term education is neglected.  We must differentiate our professional development programs.  We target their needs based on their readiness for certain types of technology.  It must be structured to help them to integrate it into their specific practices.  Finally it needs to be part of a system that will help them become well rounded in a specific skill set.  These new skills need to become part of their normal activities; otherwise the learning will be short lived. 

The second fundamental problem with the way we attack this issue is we do not set them up for success.  A component of this is time.  I have learned that unless we take something off of their plate, we should not put something else on it.  I know that is easier said than done, but we must make an effort to streamline some systems that allow teachers to take something off of their plate before placing a professional development goal onto their plates.  Now, with that comes a set of structured supports and accountability.  Teachers must be held accountable to implementing the technology they learn into their lessons.  They should be allowed to investigate, practice, and implement these tools with our support.  That support and time costs money, but it is money worth investing.  Once these teachers begin their journey to “Advanced Tech”, and then they are more likely to continue without our constant prodding and nagging.  It becomes something they want to do and enjoy doing for their students, because they have seen it work in their own classrooms.

No comments:

Post a Comment